ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01764
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded
to honorable.
________________________________________________________________
RESUME OF CASE:
On 13 Feb 14, the Board considered and denied the applicants
request to upgrade her general (under honorable conditions)
discharge to honorable For an accounting of the facts and
circumstances surrounding the applicants requests, and the
rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record
of Proceedings at Exhibit D.
On 22 Mar 14, the applicant submitted a request for
reconsideration based on clemency. As new evidence, she submits
a three-page typed statement outlining her life since leaving
the military. She includes a photocopy of a photograph of her
three children; all whom she states are officers in the U.S.
military. Additionally, she includes a copy of her resume,
Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration, various
certificates, and copies of college transcripts.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
After again reviewing this application and the supporting
documents provided by the applicant, we remain unconvinced that
any relief is warranted. In the interest of justice, we
considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we
do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to recommend
granting relief on that basis. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting
the relief sought.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-01764 in Executive Session on 11 Feb 15, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit D. Record of Proceedings, dated 25 Feb 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 22 Mar 14, w/atchs.
2
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01764
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01764 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicants general discharge. Applicant's Master Personnel...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05858
In support of her request, she submits copies of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and DD Forms 256 AF, Honorable Discharge Certificate. The application was received more than three years since the alleged error or injustice was discovered; therefore, the request is not timely. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Apr 14, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03201
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03201 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00755
An evaluation officer reviewed the applicants case and recommended she be discharged from the Air Force and furnished a general discharge for an apathetic and defective attitude only after being considered for rehabilitation. On 27 Mar 81, the applicant was furnished a general (under honorable conditions) discharge and was credited with 1 year and 16 days of total active service. On 28 Apr 82, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered the applicants request to upgrade her...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01987
On 29 Nov 11, the applicant applied to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have her discharge upgraded to honorable. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicants commander notified her she was being separated...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01795
RESUME OF THE CASE On 13 Feb 14, the Board considered and denied the applicants original request for her deceased father to be awarded the PH. She contends that during a bombing mission on 25 Jun 44, her father received multiple shrapnel wounds to his lower extremities as the direct result of enemy fire which required medical attention. In support of her contention, she submits documentation showing her father was placed on a seven-day leave of absence on or about 1 Jul 44; cites Army...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05506
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05506 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge [sic] be upgraded. The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: She was never...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 04757
RESUME OF THE CASE: On 25 May 11, the Board considered and denied the applicants original request to make the same corrections to her records. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants original request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E. On 27 Feb 14, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration of her original application based upon clemency, and submitted two letters of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05347
DPSIM states that on 15 April 2012, the applicant took an FA and received a composite score of 79.20, an unsatisfactory fitness level, because the applicant did not meet the minimum time for the cardio portion of the FA. This allows time for reconditioning, if exempted for greater than 30 days. The applicant did not provide the AF Form 422 nor AF Form 469 indicating when she was placed on profile, what her profile restrictions were, or when she was released from her profile. The complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03015
The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis.